Tuesday, October 27, 2009

A Glimpse of Our Long-Term Future

William Pesek is pointing out problems again. Yep, another week has passed.

Japan faces debt tsunami

David Einhorn was right about Lehman Brothers being a house of cards. What about Japan?

The New York-based hedge-fund manager who bet against Lehman Brothers says, “It is hard to see how Japan could avoid a government default or hyperinflationary currency death spiral” once borrowing costs increase. Lehman was one thing; Japan crashing is too frightening to contemplate.

Einhorn’s firm, Greenlight Capital, has bought options that anticipate much higher interest rates. He is betting on a phenomenon many tried to time for a decade: a meltdown in a bond market with irrationally low yields.


We're very much following in Japan's footsteps. Based on how much we're borrowing to fund these never ending recoveries (two stock market crashes and one housing market crash just nine years into the new century), I'd say that in 10 years we should be where Japan is now.

We seem to be the lemmings of the financial world. Will we continue to walk in Japan's footsteps once they walk off the cliff? Will the global economy allow us to keep on that path if Japan's "too frightening to contemplate" becomes way too real to ignore?

Japanese asset price bubble

With so much money readily available for investment, speculation was inevitable, particularly in the Tokyo Stock Exchange and the real estate market. The Nikkei stock index hit its all-time high on December 29, 1989 when it reached an intra-day high of 38,957.44 before closing at 38,915.87. Additionally, banks granted increasingly risky loans.

My bearishness is not measured in days, weeks, or months, or even years. It is measured in decades. Japan has been struggling for two decades so far. We're just one decade behind them.

8 comments:

dearieme said...

What I don't understand about remarks such as "Einhorn’s firm ...has bought options that anticipate much higher interest rates" is: what about the counterparty risk? If we face armageddon, why can one be confident that there will be a counterparty to pay up when the bet wins?
The attractions of beans and bog rolls are very real.

mab said...

Stag,

We're very lucky to have Bernanke at the helm during this financial crisis. He understands how critically important it is to keep prices from falling from bubble levels.

For the life of me, I can't understand why those dopey Dutch didn't do more to keep the price of tulips bulbs higher after the mania wore off. They just sat there and watched all their tulip wealth vanish. Weird.

EconomicDisconnect said...

Mark,
what you fail to understand is that Japan made some very serious policy mistakes, as pointed out by such luminaries as Greenspan and Krugman. Japan provided cheap liquidity to their banks and refused to write down bad loans and this has been their problem all along. "Zombie Banks" I believe is the term.

Here in America we are......oh wait. Crap.

Stagflationary Mark said...

dearieme,

I never understood that either. I'd personally love to offer Armageddon insurance though. I'd offer it cheap!

$1 trillion dollars in coverage for just $1 a week! I'd only pay if the earth ceased to exist though. ;)

Stagflationary Mark said...

mab,

"They just sat there and watched all their tulip wealth vanish. Weird."

I don't think you are giving them enough "CREDIT" (pun intended).

I'm sure there were secret meetings behind closed doors by the tulip bulb elite, lol. ;)

Stagflationary Mark said...

GYSC,

Zombie Snails

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWB_COSUXMw

mab said...

Stag,

I'm sure there were secret meetings behind closed doors by the tulip bulb elite,

Secret meetings? Don't go there mab......must resist...self...preservation...

They tulip bulb elite were no doubt plotting how to prevent their personal wealth from getting poned by the bursting bubble.

Ponzi scheme or ponezi scheme?

You had to ask. Ponezi schemes are legitimate wealth transfer strategies for insiders. Ponzi schemes are illegal wealth transfer schemes. A distinction with a difference.

Must... resist... don't go there ..... have you ever CONsidered that the stock and housing bubbles were purposefully orchestrated? Just kidding. The fed and regulators would never allow the public to get powned....I mean fleeced....I mean mistakely misled like that by random events.

And just to be clear, Bernanke's helicopter speech wasn't a veiled threat to dispatch "black" helicopters to those that questioned the public powning.

Caveat emptor! Past performance... See, they warned the public of the risks.

I gotta run.

Stagflationary Mark said...

mab,

"They tulip bulb elite were no doubt plotting how to prevent their personal wealth from getting poned by the bursting bubble."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Brvl3gcGwE